🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉

Not many can claim 25 years on the Internet! Join us in celebrating this milestone. Learn more about our history, and thank you for being a part of our community!

New Mod Guide

Started by
21 comments, last by SiCrane 14 years, 8 months ago
The moderating outside the forum thing I remember Dave saying once on the mailing list. I could probably find it if I tried hard enough, but it really stuck with me, because it was a "WTF?" kind of moment. As in no one told me that fact, and I don't remember ever hearing anything like it before or since.

And the stealth ban I'm thinking of was for bishop_pass.

Everything else I tried to work verbage for and uploaded the updated version.
Advertisement
Found it (from Dave on Sept 13,2004, subject: moderator roles):
Quote:
We've added a number of new moderators over the past several months, and partly
because of that, and partly because of some general drifting that's happened
over time, there's been a trend that I'd like to put an end to.

If you've been assigned to a specific forum, then your moderation should be
mostly limited to that forum. You were probably picked because you demonstrated
a certain level of aptitude in the topic(s) covered by your forum, and you
probably had earned the respect of other people in your forum. You weren't
necessarily evaluated by the same standards that rovers are evaluated.

Rovers *are* expected to moderate in many forums, so when I choose them, the way
they interact with the community is my primary consideration.

The trend has been that many "assigned" moderators are acting as roving
moderators. In the past, this has been acceptable, and even encouraged, but we
now have a number of new rovers and better moderation tools, so I'd like to ask
the assigned moderators to avoid moderating in forums outside of your own. This
isn't to say you can't do it at all - if you see someone spamming or posting
porn for example, feel free to step in - but be very conservative about it. If
in doubt, don't do anything. Wait for the assigned moderator, rovers, or staff
to come along, and post an alert if you feel the need.

There are exceptions to this rule - in particular, moderators who started off as
rovers and later were assigned to a forum. You probably already know who you
are. If not, feel free to ask.
Yup, I think this is in line with that - that you should be leaving the majority of moderation in forums that are not your own to the mod who does own that forum, but you can still go ahead and clean up spam threads or crossposts or things like that.

bishop_pass is who I was thinking of too. I think Michalson forgot about that incident, as it has indeed resulted the creation of a 'silently banned' user group.

The guide looks good, nice work. Oh, though in the new text about the swear filter/themes it says "though we've ever done it" and I assume that should be 'never' [smile]

Richard "Superpig" Fine - saving pigs from untimely fates - Microsoft DirectX MVP 2006/2007/2008/2009
"Shaders are not meant to do everything. Of course you can try to use it for everything, but it's like playing football using cabbage." - MickeyMouse

Oops. Show what you get for relying on spell check. :P
Looks good to me, that seems to explain all the important things a new mod might want/need to know, and isn't an overly long read, which is probably also a good thing.

- Jason Astle-Adams

We've got a guinea pig. Paging Mr Hoxley, paging Mr Hoxley...

Richard "Superpig" Fine - saving pigs from untimely fates - Microsoft DirectX MVP 2006/2007/2008/2009
"Shaders are not meant to do everything. Of course you can try to use it for everything, but it's like playing football using cabbage." - MickeyMouse

Quote: Original post by superpig
We've got a guinea pig. Paging Mr Hoxley, paging Mr Hoxley...

I don't like this whole moderator thing... I'm a n00b guinea pig thats pending a "probing"! [lol]

Jack

<hr align="left" width="25%" />
Jack Hoxley <small>[</small><small> Forum FAQ | Revised FAQ | MVP Profile | Developer Journal ]</small>

Actually, last time I checked, experiments on guinea pigs have more ethical restraints than experiments on new moderators. And didn't Fruny already do the probing?
Quote: Original post by SiCrane
Actually, last time I checked, experiments on guinea pigs have more ethical restraints than experiments on new moderators. And didn't Fruny already do the probing?

I forgot about that... apparently there were no WMD's found. I always said that was true, and the Nato inspectors concurred, but well...

Jack

<hr align="left" width="25%" />
Jack Hoxley <small>[</small><small> Forum FAQ | Revised FAQ | MVP Profile | Developer Journal ]</small>

Very nice SiCrane. Yeah, I was going to post something I had written that was similar to yours (although, not as complete in some areas), but then the holidays hit.

In time the project grows, the ignorance of its devs it shows, with many a convoluted function, it plunges into deep compunction, the price of failure is high, Washu's mirth is nigh.

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement